One of the
overarching themes of this extraordinary novel is that of negation. It is
embodied in a plethora of instances in the book, illustrating how Forster was
more concerned with the consequences or effects of the events on the characters
rather than the events themselves. These non-events however are of great
significance to the plot and context of the novel and I could not imagine this amazing
piece of literature without them.
One such
incident is the imagined rape of Adela. She wrongly accuses Aziz, the young
Indian Muslim doctor of sexually harassing her in the Marabar Caves. I feel this
mysterious insult has arisen as a result of the sexual embarrassment she is experiencing
after realizing she doesn’t love Ronny, the man she is planning to marry. In Chapter 22, when she attempts to logically
analyze her experience, she becomes more and more horrified at the thought that she might have been mistaken, displayed in her conversation with
Ronny: ‘It would be so appalling if I was wrong. I should take my own life’.
[1]
After recovering from her delirious state [2]
and especially at the court [3],
she becomes increasingly assured of the fact that it was simply a shadow that
had pulled around her in the eerie caves, never touching her, but magnified in
her mind by the deafening, creepy echo and upsetting her to the extent that her
wild imagination cemented it as her host [4].
Thus, the trial which is the centre of much action, and specifically racial
tensions never actually takes place. She testifies to Aziz’s innocence publicly
in statements like : ‘ I’m afraid I have made a mistake.’ [5] and ‘ I withdraw everything.’ [6]
Withdrawal
is a recurring word in the chapters surrounding the court proceedings and spurs
up connotations of negation as well, The less attentive reader may question why
this incident was included in the novel, echoed by Fielding in this dialogue
about Adela: ‘Why make such a charge if you were going to withdraw it?’ [7]By
describing the scenario surrounding Adela’s hallucination of being raped by
Aziz, Forster is able to depict how the English were greedy for any bait they
could use to implicate the Indians in anything inhumane or illegal. This is
evident in the stereotypical British reaction to Aziz’s arrest: they are
complacent and self-satisfied, almost as if the apparent tragedy Adela has gone
through confirms their suspicions about the Indians’ immorality and
backwardness.
What caught
my attention in particular in relevance to this theme was Forster’s
not-so-subtle attempt to upstage the British perspective by cleverly focusing
the attention of the reader on Aziz’s innocence rather than Adela’s allegation.
The plot itself depicts negation in how Aziz is wronged rather than on what
actually happened in the caves or who the real rapist is, naturally persuading
the reader to sympathize with him.
[1] pg 193
[2] pg 183
[3] pg 214
[4] pg 215
[5] pg 215
[6] pg 216
[7] pg 225
No comments:
Post a Comment