The liberal colonizer, Adela Quested, can be distinguished from the
average traditional minded colonizer from her thought process. This is realized
from the conversation that takes place between Adela and Ronny and later
between Adela and Mr. Turton.
Ronny: Soon after I came out I asked one of the
pleaders (Vakil Mahmoud Ali) to have a smoke with me- only a cigarette, mind. I
found afterward that he had send touts all over the bazaar to announce the fact...
Ever since then I have dropped on him in court as hard as I could. Its taught
me a lesson, and I hope him.
Adela: Isn’t the lesson that you should invite all
the pleaders to have a smoke with you.
Ronny: I prefer my smoke at the Club, amongst my
own sort, I’m afraid.
Adela: Why not ask the pleaders to the Club?
The difference in reaction here exemplifies the divergence of thought and
opinion between the liberal and the traditional colonizer. Ronny relays this
incident as ‘an example of the mistakes one makes’ which ultimately ought to be
corrected. Whereas Adela construes this as an opportunity for Ronny to extend
the same courtesy to the other Indian pleaders in order to establish friendly and
meaningful interactions between the English and the Indians.
This humanistic attitude can also be seen at another instance at the
club when she casually announces “I want to see the real India” and later again
when she addresses Mr. Turton, “I only want to meet those Indians whom you come
across socially-as your friends” (24) . To which he replies, “Well, we don’t come
across them socially” (24).
Both conversations, with Ronny and Mr. Turton, depict the presence of clear
social boundaries set out by the imperial system which maintain the status quo between
the colonizer and the colonized- through exclusive institutions like the Club. What sets Adela apart as a liberal colonizer? Firstly,
her rational thought process which we can see in Chapter V when she consciously
reassures herself that –‘I should never get like that ’(the Turtons and the
Burtons representing the traditional like minded colonizers)- because she is cognizant
of the imperial system as something ‘insidious’ and ‘tough’ (43). And secondly,
her humanistic outlook which places value and worth in the individual be it the
colonizer or the colonized.
No comments:
Post a Comment